I believe time alignment is not per frequency or frequency band, but rather the entire signal. As is the delay setting for your speaker distance in the receiver.
You don't really want every frequency of the subs to have the same modal reinforcement, as that would just accentuate certain frequencies and wouldn't destructively flatten peaks.
Your sub(s) is already interacting with the room to create the big peaks and valleys in the response.
Moving one sub and the audience yields a different modal response. You find the least worst.
Adding more subs that have different modal responses "smooths" the overall response heard by the audience.
Read the Harmon paper, read about the Geddes method, buy two or three subs, and hope that Audessey does a good enough job, or play with REW to see the response and tweak further. The latter is almost necessary to start with the best response for Audessey to work from.
I believe time alignment is not per frequency or frequency band, but rather the entire signal. As is the delay setting for your speaker distance in the receiver.
You don't really want every frequency of the subs to have the same modal reinforcement, as that would just accentuate certain frequencies and wouldn't destructively flatten peaks.
Your sub(s) is already interacting with the room to create the big peaks and valleys in the response.
Moving one sub and the audience yields a different modal response. You find the least worst.
Adding more subs that have different modal responses "smooths" the overall response heard by the audience.
Read the Harmon paper, read about the Geddes method, buy two or three subs, and hope that Audessey does a good enough job, or play with REW to see the response and tweak further. The latter is almost necessary to start with the best response for Audessey to work from.