I've been researching all of the options that I have in the >$5000 range for a 16:9 picture in the 35-45" diagonal range. Here is what I have come up with and it's just confusing. If anyone could add/remove/correct these pros/cons that I have at this point.
My current viewing situation is a non light controled room with a short 5-12' viewing distance. A wide viewing range would be nice. I have 4' of depth where the tv would be placed. Viewing would be probaby 50-50 4:3 and 16:9, but 16:9 480p would be the format that I'm giving prefrence to.
FPTV
These appear to be ruled out in my situation. The room is just too small to support a FPTV. The non light controled room is also a strike against it.
RPTV
Cheap for their size. These sets can be nice, but I am still aprehensive about them. Small CRT's combined with a restrictive viewing angle strike agains them. Convergance appears to have been mostly resolved in these with newer computer assisted convergance. "Flare", "Red Push" and other interesting terms also scare me away from these sets. Burn in still is a big concern for these sets.
Direct View.
Largest 16:9 picture availible is 38". Costly for the screen size. The most proven technology. Great viewing angles. Very good lifespans.
Plasma
Great stable picture. 848x480 resolution is almost a perfect match for 480p materal. Still a new technology. Needs an extenal tuner. Burn in is still an issue. Very costly.
HT is something that I am interested in, but I have to consiter cost and lifespan with each of these technologies. Currently I'm leaning twards direct view for lifespan and brightness, RPTV for size, and plasma as best for 480p ( at a price ). So I'm stuck. I just can't seem to resolve all of the possible issues.
If anyone can add thier own comments it would be most appreciated.
My current viewing situation is a non light controled room with a short 5-12' viewing distance. A wide viewing range would be nice. I have 4' of depth where the tv would be placed. Viewing would be probaby 50-50 4:3 and 16:9, but 16:9 480p would be the format that I'm giving prefrence to.
FPTV
These appear to be ruled out in my situation. The room is just too small to support a FPTV. The non light controled room is also a strike against it.
RPTV
Cheap for their size. These sets can be nice, but I am still aprehensive about them. Small CRT's combined with a restrictive viewing angle strike agains them. Convergance appears to have been mostly resolved in these with newer computer assisted convergance. "Flare", "Red Push" and other interesting terms also scare me away from these sets. Burn in still is a big concern for these sets.
Direct View.
Largest 16:9 picture availible is 38". Costly for the screen size. The most proven technology. Great viewing angles. Very good lifespans.
Plasma
Great stable picture. 848x480 resolution is almost a perfect match for 480p materal. Still a new technology. Needs an extenal tuner. Burn in is still an issue. Very costly.
HT is something that I am interested in, but I have to consiter cost and lifespan with each of these technologies. Currently I'm leaning twards direct view for lifespan and brightness, RPTV for size, and plasma as best for 480p ( at a price ). So I'm stuck. I just can't seem to resolve all of the possible issues.
If anyone can add thier own comments it would be most appreciated.