Not exactly.
In audio there are three definitions of near field and far field. One is the zone in which a speaker works as a line source versus point source. Where the radiation characteristic is line source is the near field, where it is point source is the far field. It explains how line arrays work differently than point sources. Jim Griffin's whitepaper on line arrays explains it well.
The second is referenced to mic placement when measuring speaker response, usually meaning an inch or so from the driver or port output being measured. Doing so each radiating element of the speaker is measured individually, with their responses summed to give the full broadband result. This differs from a far field measurement, where the mic is placed beyond the point in space where all of the wave fronts have integrated into one.
Where speakers are concerned near fields are designed for listening at close distances, configured so that even at, say, four feet, the individual wave fronts are fully integrated into one. That makes the use of the name 'near field' a misnomer, as what it actually means is that the speaker is functioning in the far field quite close to the speaker.
The use of the name 'near field monitor' isn't related to the home audio industry. It was coined by the recording industry, where near fields are typically mounted on or just above the console, quite close to the listening position of the engineer. They got the name 'near field' from the fact that they're placed near the listener.