AVS Forum banner
Status
Not open for further replies.
1 - 20 of 21 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
1,422 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
I'd like to use Sound Forge to generate all the test tones I need to measure my subwoofer's in-room response (from 10 Hz to 200 Hz). Can anyone please tell me what parameters I should use when synthesizing with Sound Forge:

(1) Waveform shape: sine, absolute sine, square, saw, triangle, etc.? I assume its sine, but would like a confirmation please.

(2) Amplitude: 0 db? Or less? Does it matter?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,258 Posts
Sine. All the other waveforms simply add higher frequency harmonics.


0 dB amplitude will give you maximum signal-to-noise. This is more than adequate for any subwoofer. Just make sure the volume isn't cranked up too high.


- Terry
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,422 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
Thanks much Terry! So should I use a lower amplitude than 0 dB, like -12? If I use the 0dB test tone, what level should I be looking for on my SPL (by lowering/raising my master volume control on my AVR)?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
406 Posts
Have you tried the mls measurements of Angelino Farina?

http://pcfarina.eng.unipr.it/aurora/home.htm


Free plugin to the syntrillium cool edit software (now adobe)


MLS/synchonized swept sine gives certain advantages:

*time windowing (for direct sound or reflected sound)

*better frequency resolution

*All information is contained in an impulse response, meaning that a single measurement may be postprocessed to give you any information that you want

*good snr characteristics




regards

Knut Inge
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,422 Posts
Discussion Starter · #10 ·
Thanks for the responses folks. I just measured all the test tones I generated and I don't seem to have any hole between 10-200 Hz, so that's good news.


Just one more question: when measuring these test tones should I set my receiver's bass out to: SWFR or BOTH (both meaning sub and front speakers)? I watch movies with it set to BOTH, so I should be measuring frequency response that way, right? Or do I only wanna be measuring frequency response of my sub (by setting bass out to SWFR)?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,422 Posts
Discussion Starter · #16 ·
I'm a big fan of proper calibration, and that's why I bought an SPL meter, DVE and Avia to fine tune the sound and picture of my HT. Despite that, I'm not a die-hard hardcore calibrator, and having done the 3rd octave freq. response check and having resolved a minor dip at 63 Hz, I'm very happy with the way my HT sounds. Don't you think that for most general, mainstream calibration purposes a 3rd octave test is sufficient?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,801 Posts
Quote:
Then you measured wrong. Every room in the world has peaks and severe nulls
Some rooms are worse than others. Ironically, small, purpose-built sound rooms with solid construction are much worse than than a typical open-floor-plan living room with stud walls, lots of windows and lots of doors and openings to other spaces. In an open, light construction room, with careful positioning of the money seat and the speakers well away from the walls, you can usually avoid deep nulls if you work at it a little. The "bass traps" were built in by the architect and the contractor.
 
1 - 20 of 21 Posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top