Originally Posted by drjay71 /t/1526650/what-are-the-different-ways-to-stretch-16-9-content-to-fill-a-2-35-screen#post_24590353
Sorry for the noob question. I know an anamorphic lens will do the stretch and so would a device like the Lumagen. Are there any other options?
Originally Posted by Josh Z /t/1526650/what-are-the-different-ways-to-stretch-16-9-content-to-fill-a-2-35-screen#post_24592234
What is it you're looking to do, exactly? The geometry is what it is. 16:9 is not the same shape as 2.35:1. You can either pillarbox it in the center of the screen with black bars on the sides, or you can stretch it to make it fill the screen, at the cost of the picture looking weird and distorted.
What are you trying to watch, and what result do you want to see on your screen?
Originally Posted by drjay71 /t/1526650/what-are-the-different-ways-to-stretch-16-9-content-to-fill-a-2-35-screen#post_24592385
Yes, I understand. I want the 16:9 image (NFL let's say) to fill the screen at the cost of distortion which I hear is not too bad with a non linear stretch
Originally Posted by DavidHir /t/1526650/what-are-the-different-ways-to-stretch-16-9-content-to-fill-a-2-35-screen#post_24593540
If you want 16:9 content to "fill" a 2:35:1 screen more, you're much better off overscanning the image than anything else. You won't be able to fill the rest of the screen without the light spilling onto the walls. However, if the walls are very dark and you have some sort of velvet border (or even background) this will catch most of that spill light. Maybe do partial overscan as a compromise to minimize light spill although you will still have some visible vertical black bars on the screen. I just cannot understand geometrically distorting an image, nor am I crazy about overscanning - but that is still a better option if it has to be one or the other IMO.
Originally Posted by Josh Z /t/1526650/what-are-the-different-ways-to-stretch-16-9-content-to-fill-a-2-35-screen#post_24595963
The problem with overscanning in his situation is that, if he wants to watch sports, he'll lose the score and stats and other info displayed at the top and bottom of the frame.
It is BrolicBeast. His YouTube video is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jwF7nYe-YzM . The negative, as I understand it, is that you are both zoomed and scaled in that scenario. However, he did say that you could still see the score etc. (Football) when using the non-linear stretch.Quote:
Originally Posted by drummermitchell /t/1526650/what-are-the-different-ways-to-stretch-16-9-content-to-fill-a-2-35-screen#post_24816213
There is a member here(forgot his user name)but he demonstrates using a Lumagen mini 3D for doing exactly what you ask.
He has demos on youtube as well.
Some program is framed with enough height to allow (scaling + optics) it to be projected onto a Scope screen. From a purest POV, you don't do it, yet sometimes, it just enhances the look of the program. AVATAR is IMO one example that looks stunning in Scope.
The issue with doing this for a sports game is that you may lose the score.
Agreed. Horizontal panning gives a really disturbing fish-eye effect during NLS.Sports are one thing likely to look terrible with NLS. One of the things that makes non-linear-stretch most obvious/terrible is horizontal panning. And there's lots of that with sports.
That may be better than the NLS especially when watching sports. I assume I can do a linear stretch with the Lumagen. Any other less expensive ways of doing this?Note you don't need to use NLS mode to fill the 2.35 screen with 16:9 material, you can just use a linear stretch which would not have the horizontal panning artifacts -- just short, wide people.
Yes with the Lumagen you can have fine control over e.g. the fraction of the center slice of the 16:9 image that is linearly stretched (including the whole image). See the manual for the various parameters to NLS. I don't think the DVDO Duo would work for this but its the only other processor I'm vaguely familiar with.That may be better than the NLS especially when watching sports. I assume I can do a linear stretch with the Lumagen. Any other less expensive ways of doing this?