Right now they are more 2.35:1 title than 1.85:1 one. Each film is release in their OAR ratio and thanks god for that..
Originally Posted by JasonR Something that I've been wondering is, wouldn't 16x9 technically be a higher resolution image, since it uses more of the screen? |
Originally Posted by HorrorScope I usually don't start threads and I did a quick search. I was just wondering are most releases 16x9 or 2:35 (rounding their close cousins to those formats) or are they relatively a close 50-50? Thanks. |
Originally Posted by HorrorScope FWIW, I heard Unforgiven was 1.85 as well from a review in here yesterday, not true? |
Originally Posted by HorrorScope Thanks though with the feedback, was wondering what the plan was and it seems they are keeping theatrical dimensions in-tact and not moving most to fit 1.85. |
Originally Posted by Rachael Bellomy Daniel Boone shot a black bar on this tree, 2006.... |
Originally Posted by Chris Moreau Rachael, I don't know how old you are, but I'll bet there are few of us, here, who actually remember the song about Daniel Boone who "killed him a bar, when he was only three." Edited to add: Now that I think about it, I believe it was Davy Crockett who shot that bar! |
Originally Posted by LimeLizzards I guess this is format based. There was talk of what resolution will be on the discs when released. Does anyone know what res is on the disc's that have be released so far? ie 1280*720 or 1920*1080? |
Originally Posted by longshot I'd be interested to know what percentage of folks who have HD DVD have plasma/rptv versus front projection. Those that have FP what percentage have constant height. |
Rachael, I don't know how old you are, but I'll bet there are few of us, here, who actually remember the song about Daniel Boone who "killed him a bar, when he was only three." |
Something that I've been wondering is, wouldn't 16x9 technically be a higher resolution image, since it uses more of the screen? |