1080p isnt any better than 1080i for film based sources. (as long as your display/scaler does the proper inverse telecine)
Originally Posted by WiFi-Spy 1080p isnt any better than 1080i for film based sources. (as long as your display/scaler does the proper inverse telecine) |
Originally Posted by angelo913 I agree. I know that current releases of HD-DVD are 1080p but the important factor it's 24frames/s. It's very highend 1080p HDTVs that can play back 1080p24 properly. It's less expensive to support 1080i in HDTVs with 60fields/s and easier to convert 1080p24 movies too. I'm reading an article in the Sound & Vision magazine May issue on the Sharp LC-65D90U 65inch LCD. I quote the author, "Overall, Sharp's LC-65D90U is one of the best LCD TVs I've seen...". Also the Sharp's LC-65D90U is a full 1920x1080 screen and it doesn't support 1080P, to boot. ...Angelo |
Originally Posted by thehalogod Because I'm apparently stupid... that and I didn't see any on my first skim. |
Originally Posted by Ilka Well, sure if you ever only want to show 1080p24 film-based sources, you are correct. But we are being marketed now for 1080p60 (PS3, XBOX HD-DVD???, HTPC). Your argument would hold merit, if it were stated a few years ago. |