Well, since I don't starve my eye sight of any internal bandwidth, I must reluctantly choose real life. Damn reality.
Originally Posted by Marcus Carr Interesting discussion, but what does it have to do with the thread title? |
Originally Posted by CycloneGT HD is better. Eyes either focus on the foreground or the background. An HD picture can look perfect despite depth. I usually noticed this during basketball games, when I could see people in the stands in perfect focus while also seeing the players clearly. Real Life my eyes don't do that. |
Originally Posted by Naylia now the only problem there is getting Jessica to stop by the house |
Originally Posted by Karyk And coordinating that with the wife/SO being out of the house! |
Originally Posted by JMartinko People here really need to get out of their theater chairs more times than to just get to the bathroom. Jessica Alba in the flesh in my living room, or Jessica Alba on a 120 in theater screen???? There are more to your senses than just the eyes. If you even ask you have been in the theater too long. I can't believe there is a thread like this. |
Originally Posted by libracolo Ok, here is a poll type question: In your opinion, which looks better, HD or life? Say you are standing in a field surrounded by lots of various things (trees, clouds, grass, etc). Also, taking into account that nothing is physically wrong with your sight, which looks better looking at that field in real life or viewing it in HD? |
Originally Posted by Cucuy Assumming only the 1 sense is involved I would prefer HD cuz' I don't think I will ever get that close to Jessica de Alba to see that detail. Now if more than one sense is involved I would definetly prefer real life. Don't want to miss what she smells like |
Originally Posted by Naylia I wasn't really thinking 'smell' as my second preferred sense |