Quote:
Originally posted by Jerry G
Forgive me, but that just doesn't work very well for me.
You said that Showtime doesn have the money to provide the level of HDTV that HBO does. There must be some basis for your statement. I know you wouldn't say it without such a basis.
I'm simply asking you for that basis. Is it something you were told by a Showtime employee? Is it something you read in a SEC filing? Something available to Showtime stockholders? I'm just simply interested in learning more about Showtime's financial problems that you seem to be alluding to.
Thanks very much and I look forward to your reply. I'm quite confident you will respect this forum and it's participants by providing a real and honest answer. If you know me, then you know I will persist in discovering the basis for this. I have spoken with Richard Southard of Showtime on a number of occasions. It's been awhile, but I can give him a call and see if he can shed some light on the financial situation at Showtime. But before I call him, I'd like to gather more information from you on this rather significant and disconcerting issue. |
If you, like others on this forum, take note of the facts over the last two years or so, you'll likely come to the same logical conclusion:
>Showtime is a distant second in ratings behind HBO
>HD transfers cost a substantial amount of money
>Some films that Showtime airs upconverted 16:9 or 4:3 have already been previously aired in HD on HBO
>Showtime rarely airs a true 1080i 'blockbuster' film
>Showtime doesn't produce any original series in HD -- unlike HBO
You draw your own conclusions. ..Showtime is too cheap, too broke or doesn't really care (or all of the preceding).