Is there something that leads you to believe that Audessey isn't up to par?
From everyone I have spoke to they said ARC and Dirac are way ahead.
A review by someone who held the mic in there hand is not worth considering.One reviewer's take on Audyssey and their subjective comparison to Dirac and Anthem
![]()
Audyssey Room EQ Review
This is a review and detailed measurements of the Audyssey Room Equalization. Audyssey is standard technology in a number of Audio/Video Receivers such as the Denon AVR-X3600H I recently reviewed. The standard version in the AVR is mostly all or nothing so I downloaded the Marantz/Denon...www.audiosciencereview.com
SureLet me know if you decide to change.
Possible purchase x8500 from you ?
Will do. I cant move to a processor currently as I don't have any amps so if I did make the jump it would be a ton of money out of pocket. I actually held off on doing the HDMI upgrade on my 8500. Figured it was better to hold off until I decided what I was going to do with the anthem.please update us.
I'm been looking forward to jumping on a the Dirac or ARC train for sometime. but nothing new stands out. (also i'm looking to move away from Denon as my upgrade to x8500ha was a nightmare and i'm now 2+ weeks without my unit.)
I'd like to see if NAD comes out with a new unit. (i'm also confused just just processors cost more than AVR units that are processors plus amps. I use my x8500h as only a pre)
It is a shame that units from Trinnov or StormAudio are so STUNNINGLY costly.
I will echo what others have requested. Yes, please let us know your thoughts. I have not been happy with Audyssey and intend on making the jump to Anthem next year.Will do. I cant move to a processor currently as I don't have any amps so if I did make the jump it would be a ton of money out of pocket. I actually held off on doing the HDMI upgrade on my 8500. Figured it was better to hold off until I decided what I was going to do with the anthem.
If you intend to switch regardless, why does it matter his thoughts? Would they sway you?I will echo what others have requested. Yes, please let us know your thoughts. I have not been happy with Audyssey and intend on making the jump to Anthem next year.
I guess I am interested in their thoughts for a couple of reasons. One would just be from a human interest perspective. And then another datapoint added to my research of Anthem and Arcam equipment. I guess in the end, their opinion might have swayed me some.If you intend to switch regardless, why does it matter his thoughts? Would they sway you?
Rich
I wish more people listened to advice like this. It's surprising that most people actually buy receivers and processors solely on room correction when in most cases, they have no idea what it's doing to their room. They were just told, "get a receiver with Audessey...it has the best room correction." They then let Audessey (or any other RC software) run it's measurements and spit out some results, then they walk away not quite sure what just happened. Sound comes out of all the speakers (check). Their friend told them Audessey was the "best" (check). So they just walk away thinking that they "optimized" the sound for their room. Basically, if you can't/don't/won't check to see what room correction has done to your settings and sound, and if you don't understand the importance of treating your room, you could be robbing yourself of getting the most out of your system without realizing it. Equalization is not the be-all solution that it's made out to be - actually, it's a tricky beast even under the best of circumstances. For my room and circumstances, I leave it off and manually tune my bass region with a combination of minidsp/rew and room treatment.Room EQ is generally used to reduce audible issues in the room. In the bass region, all rooms need it. That is not the case in the treble region.
The more of these room issues that are taken care of, the fewer artifacts you end up with. Adding dips and raises based on furniture, walls, etc makes the direct sound from the speakers worse. And you receive plenty of direct sound.
So pulling the seats away from the back wall, eliminating that coffee table, putting down a rug, getting the speakers away from the walls and into a triangle with your seat, will have huge audible benefits. If you can, start there before chasing another EQ solution.
I generally agree, but will add I love what Audyssey does for the bass region. I think it is very good there. Above that, as you say, it gets tricky.I wish more people listened to advice like this. It's surprising that most people actually buy receivers and processors solely on room correction when in most cases, they have no idea what it's doing to their room. They were just told, "get a receiver with Audessey...it has the best room correction." They then let Audessey (or any other RC software) run it's measurements and spit out some results, then they walk away not quite sure what just happened. Sound comes out of all the speakers (check). Their friend told them Audessey was the "best" (check). So they just walk away thinking that they "optimized" the sound for their room. Basically, if you can't/don't/won't check to see what room correction has done to your settings and sound, and if you don't understand the importance of treating your room, you could be robbing yourself of getting the most out of your system without realizing it. Equalization is not the be-all solution that it's made out to be - actually, it's a tricky beast even under the best of circumstances. For my room and circumstances, I leave it off and manually tune my bass region with a combination of minidsp/rew and room treatment.
Yes, agreed. I never had a problem with what Audyssey does with bass. It handles bass better than YPAO, Onkyo, and MCACC. However for those who can learn the ropes of REW and grab a minidsp, great bass isn't limited to just D+M receivers.I generally agree, but will add I love what Audyssey does for the bass region. I think it is very good there. Above that, as you say, it gets tricky.