LIVE: AVSForum Tech Talk Podcast with Scott Wilkinson, Episode 5 Click here for details.
Enter to be our Home Theater of the Month Click here for details.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon Spackman /forum/post/0
Yes![]()
Quote:
Originally Posted by IBIKEAZ /forum/post/0
I have a Sony 46" Bravia XBR 3 1080P tv. I bought the hd-a2 but was wondering if I would have been better with the hd-xa2? Would the 1080P HD-DVD player be better on my 1080P tv? Would it be worth theprice to upgrade? Thanks
Quote:
Originally Posted by videonut /forum/post/0
The XA2 has a very nice build quality and so far it's been a solid performer. And critical viewers will see a noticeable difference in PQ with the XA2 (more realistic skintones for starters). I consider critical viewers to be people who are constantly striving to find the nicest image quality, and are willing to spend more for items that will add to the overall viewing experience.
The casual viewer will probably not see a marked improvment in PQ between the A1 and the XA2, while some not-so-casual viewers will feel there is not enough of a difference to justify the price. The same can be said for automobile shoppers (a Lexus LS is a great ride, but it's not going to compare to a Porche Carrera when it comes to overall performance.)
But I will say that my wife and I can easily see the difference when doing blind A&B comparisons between the A1 and XA2. Is it enough of a difference to justify the price? Well that descision will have to be made on an individual basis.
Quote:
Originally Posted by videonut /forum/post/0
Okay, I have the A1 and XA2 models currently hooked up on the same display for comparisons. (I had an A2 for two days, but returned it. I wasn't crazy about the overall build quality, but in the end it was its overall PQ that decided it's fate; IMO it was not as good as the A1. Perhaps I had a bad unit? Who knows.)
The XA2 has a very nice build quality and so far it's been a solid performer. And critical viewers will see a noticeable difference in PQ with the XA2 (more realistic skintones for starters). I consider critical viewers to be people who are constantly striving to find the nicest image quality, and are willing to spend more for items that will add to the overall viewing experience.
The casual viewer will probably not see a marked improvment in PQ between the A1 and the XA2, while some not-so-casual viewers will feel there is not enough of a difference to justify the price. The same can be said for automobile shoppers (a Lexus LS is a great ride, but it's not going to compare to a Porche Carrera when it comes to overall performance.)
But I will say that my wife and I can easily see the difference when doing blind A&B comparisons between the A1 and XA2. Is it enough of a difference to justify the price? Well that descision will have to be made on an individual basis.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ac388 /forum/post/0
WHY ? Do you mean the Sony won't be able to do the Interlace/progressive process properly ???
Quote:
Originally Posted by alluringreality /forum/post/0
I have the current 50" SXRD, used the A2 for a while, and just got the XA2. Realistically if there's a picture quality improvement from the A2 to the XA2, on this size TV it seems negligable. I suppose SD might be a touch better, but it's certainly not going to make you think you're watching Crank on Blu-Ray. Basically I'd be surprised if anyone in double blind testing could pick out the XA2 over the A2 on HD.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tvine2000 /forum/post/0
from what i understand if you dont have a hdtv with hdmi 1.3 you wont see all it has to offer,so ill keep my a2!
Quote:
Originally Posted by btf1980 /forum/post/0
Personally, I don't think it's worth the price to upgrade.