AVS Forum banner
  • Our native mobile app has a new name: Fora Communities. Learn more.

X1900XT Problems with HDTV

780 Views 12 Replies 5 Participants Last post by  KLoNe
Hey guys, first post, so I hope you can help :)


I've read the various PowerStrip threads and custom resolution threads, but couldn't find any relating help.


Here we go.


Just replaced my 7800GTX with a X1900XT (OC'd to X1900XTX + Some 8) ) but I am having some terrible problems getting it to display some custom resolutions on my 62" Toshiba 1080p DLP through a DVI-HDMI cable.


The custom resolutions I am trying to get working through PowerStrip (is this the only way with an ATI card? nVidia drivers were SO much easier :( ) are 1808x1017 and 1840x1035 which ran perfectly on my 7800GTX through component.


Does anyone have any ideas here?


Many thanks guys.


Chris
Status
Not open for further replies.
1 - 13 of 13 Posts
Take it out and go back to the NVidia card. You just took a giant step backwards in usability and image quality.


Don't believe the reviews that you read on the internet, because the HQV tests they perform for deinterlacing have very little to do with media playback from DVD and HD in the real world. ATI simply optimized their drivers to perform better on this specific benchmark. Nothing new for ATI.


I have both cards and have done AB comparisons when playing back DVD and WMV-HD. I am using 1080 feeding a Qualia 004 FP on a 5' x 13' screen viewed from 14' away.


The NVidia card delivers a more detailed image than the ATI, has much more stable drivers, and much better custom res and HDTV display support than the ATI.


Vern
See less See more
It Does NOT!


Don't you see the colour banding on your ATSC / Sat/Cable HDTV or are you only into "pristine" DVD for testing?


Your test - which I've read was not what I would have done to prove definitely for myself.


Former owner of Radeon now owning an nvidia which is inferior IMHO.


Colour banding (posterization) is woeful on nVidia and fail to see how your've missed it.


DA
See less See more
Quote:
Originally Posted by KLoNe
Hey guys, first post, so I hope you can help :)


I've read the various PowerStrip threads and custom resolution threads, but couldn't find any relating help.


Here we go.


Just replaced my 7800GTX with a X1900XT (OC'd to X1900XTX + Some 8) ) but I am having some terrible problems getting it to display some custom resolutions on my 62" Toshiba 1080p DLP through a DVI-HDMI cable.


The custom resolutions I am trying to get working through PowerStrip (is this the only way with an ATI card? nVidia drivers were SO much easier :( ) are 1808x1017 and 1840x1035 which ran perfectly on my 7800GTX through component.


Does anyone have any ideas here?


Many thanks guys.

Chris
Try the following:


Component support should be also TRIED with Radeon as first test. If that fails then the FIRMWARE could be culprit. If you HAVE NOT tried custom settings in CCC with DVI to account for overscan and fails to wrk successfully then I'd GO BACK to the nvidia and TEST on DVI and see.


IMHO - I have found DVI does not work well on some firmware in HD displays via nvidia cards and it takes alot of fiddling to get the drivers to co-operate and "stick" as an EDID override.


DA.
See less See more
Quote:
Don't you see the colour banding on your ATSC / Sat/Cable HDTV or are you only into "pristine" DVD for testing?
I assume you are addressing this to me.... No, I don't see color banding in any environment. Color banding is often exacerbated by the use of certain display technology. It can also be caused by using older combinations of drivers and decoders.


I use TT for media playback in software decode mode with ffdshow doing a Lanczos 2 resize and the DScaler 4 sharpen filter and see no color banding at all on any sources. I have also tested using DXVA hardware mode, and in that case the difference between the two cards is even greater. I don't use my HTPC for ATSC/Sat/Cable, which I rarely watch in my HT anyhow. DVD, WMV-HD and HD-DVD are my sources of choice.

Quote:
Your test - which I've read was not what I would have done to prove definitely for myself.
Not sure what you are talking about? My test simply consists of playing the same source material on both PC's and pressing a single button on my remote to switch the projector inputs. It could be anything from a DVD of "Moulin Rouge" to any one of a number of test patterns on DVE Pro or any one of several other calibration discs. Or it might be a WMV-HD disc like "Coral Reef Adventure". Of course both players and both projector inputs have been calibrated using DVD Pro's test patterns before testing. Any differences in image detail, color ringing etc. are very easily seen.

Quote:
Former owner of Radeon now owning an nvidia which is inferior IMHO.
Then why do you have the NVidia in your system now?


I have 2 identical PC's one with the 7800 and one with the X1900. The only time I'll ever use the ATI equipped PC is after a new driver comes out to see if ATI has finally eliminated their lack of fine detail and reduced the ringing around any hard edges in the image.


So far, it hasn't happened. What I am treated to is the challenge of making the new driver work properly at 1080I with my Qualia. The X1900 is certainly an improvement over the X1800, which couldn't output a proper 1080I signal over DVI. But it still takes me 4 to 5 times as long with the ATI to get a custom 1080I resolution that survives a reboot.


Edit: Just read the other thread about the color banding issue. I don't know if this is why I dont see it, but I use MCE2005 in my HT systems because it's the only way to get all the DirectShow fixes available from MS. For some reason, certain modules were never released as patches for XP. I also never mess with the desktop color and level controls in the video CP, preferring to calibrate my projector's inputs to the standard default DVI outputs of the video card. Maybe that explains why I never see your banding issue????


Vern
See less See more
I would love to chuck the nVidia back in, but I had sold the 7800GTX before I bought the X1900XT (arrived the day I sent the nV off).


I will try the component, but I dont see it working. Although, I didn't actually try the 7800GTX at 1808x1017 through DVI-HDMI.


I'll see how we go.


Thanks for the help :) Please, if you get any more ideas I would love to hear them!


Really don't want to end up selling this beast of a card as games run amazlingly on it, and selling it and buying a 7900GTX would leave me with a huge loss as well :( $$$


Thanks guys :)
See less See more
Vern


Banding...and displays. Noticed failure of nvidia from 6600 to 7800 in removal of colour banding on Plasmas and LCD, DLP @ 720p vertical native via DVI/HDMI. The ATI inclusive of earlier entrants from 9550 respond really well latest efforts in Catalyst.


Tested with numerous floor displays in reseller environment. That's WHERe IT counts.


Pristine environment that are controlled by you is exactly what I'm getting at. Your controlled test cannot be objective based on a few grounds:


Embedded post processing of MPEG does transpire within the GPU as these enhancements are engaged by DRIVER embedding not by external RAW grunt CPU processing as in ffdshow. Nvidia open up there GPU enhancements via a SPECIFIC optimised codec. All your proving is that sharpening maybe already high with the ATI driver and those settings should not be applied on same level basis using FFDshow as your benchmark.


Finally as I suspected your NOT using disparate lower quality sources and what I'm seeing in quality in HDTV is inferior decode on nVidia and it weakenesses are colour banding, lack of mosquito noise removal and softer decode in sharpness.


DA
See less See more

what I'm seeing in quality in HDTV is inferior decode on nVidia and it weakenesses are colour banding, lack of mosquito noise removal and softer decode in sharpness./QUOTE]


The facts for me is that the NVidia delivers more image detail with less edge enhancement for both DVD and WMV-HD sources. Neither card displays banding on any my displays. I won't confuse sharpness, which is artificially induced and is intolerable on a large screen, with image detail which is the true measure of a image quality on a large screen.


It's obvious to me that ATI is applying some additional processing to the video signal. The fact remains, however, that possibly due to the processing or for some other reason, the ATI cannot deliver as detailed an image. You can test in as many environments as you want, the fact remains that the NVidia delivers a more detailed image with less visible EE and no banding, mosquito noise, or other artifacts on my very large screen or on my Sony 1920x1200 LCD display.


That's the end game for me.


If you want to accept an image that has less detail and more EE as the price for reduced or eliminated banding on specific displays, that is your choice.


I'll take the cleaner unprocessed signal path any day. And, if ATI manages to deliver that in the future, then I'll have no problem switching to using the ATI in my HT.


You are free to choose your path, I have already chosen mine.


Vern
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vern Dias
Don't believe the reviews that you read on the internet, because the HQV tests they perform for deinterlacing have very little to do with media playback from DVD and HD in the real world. ATI simply optimized their drivers to perform better on this specific benchmark. Nothing new for ATI.
Utter crap, there was no cheating involved whatsoever merely tuning of their detection and deinterlacing. You need to review driver history to see all the cheats and shortcuts nVidia have done over the years. I have the 7900GTX and X1900XTX and the ATI is clearly superior and has more stable drivers.
Quote:
Utter crap.
Thei I would assume you have two identical PC's one with ATI and the other with NVidia and are able to do AB comparisons, correct?


Vern
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vern Dias
Thei I would assume you have two identical PC's one with ATI and the other with NVidia and are able to do AB comparisons, correct?


Vern
Correct. P5WD2-E with D930 running at 5 GHZ in both boxes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zissou
Utter crap, there was no cheating involved whatsoever merely tuning of their detection and deinterlacing. You need to review driver history to see all the cheats and shortcuts nVidia have done over the years. I have the 7900GTX and X1900XTX and the ATI is clearly superior and has more stable drivers.
Clearly superior in what way, and for what purpose?

Games, SD video, HD video, and at what output resolution, connected to what kind of display.


Please be specific.
I knew you couldn't stay away Owen ;)


Back into it, I still can't get it to run at ANY sort of custom resolution.


Running on the 6.3 drivers now, and it does seem to run a little more stable.


God damn this X1900 runs fast for games though :)
1 - 13 of 13 Posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top