XG 135 and 110 - What's the Difference?
-
AVSForum Tech Talk Podcast with Scott Wilkinson Click here for details.
-
Enter to be our Home Theater of the Month Click here for details.
- Status
1 - 13 of 13 Posts
Joined
·
18,506 Posts
The bandwidth is also a bit better on the 135, but IMHO in the same condition, you'd never see a difference between the two.
At least for HT purposes.
Curt
At least for HT purposes.
Curt
Joined
·
18,506 Posts
If you read the posts on this foru,, it's a general consensus that 8" tubes cannot do 1080p properly.
Personally I find that a lot of people go on specs alone, and never look at the actual useage requirements. I doubt you'll ever scan over 64 Khz, which is less than half of what the XG 135 can do in the first place.
Theoretically, the extra bandwidth of the 135 means it will show a bit more picture detail, but again, you'll never use it IMHO.
(See my post here on the XG/9500LC comments).
Curt
Personally I find that a lot of people go on specs alone, and never look at the actual useage requirements. I doubt you'll ever scan over 64 Khz, which is less than half of what the XG 135 can do in the first place.
Theoretically, the extra bandwidth of the 135 means it will show a bit more picture detail, but again, you'll never use it IMHO.
(See my post here on the XG/9500LC comments).
Curt
Joined
·
3,480 Posts
Psychological, who cares what the differance is if you have the 135.
Resale value, easier to sell, holds it value better.
Bragging rights.
Deron.
Resale value, easier to sell, holds it value better.
Bragging rights.
Deron.
1 - 13 of 13 Posts
- Status
Join the discussion
